The League of Young Voters

Young People, Idealism, and Learning — By Sam Frankel
May 12, 2008, 5:07 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

[Cross-posters from Sam’s blog.]

Like almost everyone who writes frequently for a living, Tom Friedman’s written persona comes across as a little fragmented, but he’s been popping up on my radar a lot the last year or so saying some stuff that gets my head nodding. From today’s NYT (and a “hat tip” to Lizardbox on Dailykos):

It is especially not trivial now, because millions of Americans are dying to be enlisted — enlisted to fix education, enlisted to research renewable energy, enlisted to repair our infrastructure, enlisted to help others. Look at the kids lining up to join Teach for America. They want our country to matter again. They want it to be about building wealth and dignity — big profits and big purposes. When we just do one, we are less than the sum of our parts. When we do both, said Shriver, “no one can touch us.

Hell. Yes. There’s this cynical attitude that young people’s idealism is simply inexperience, and that once we’ve learned a little bit about how challenging it is to [fill in the blank] we’ll settle down. But that misses the whole point. Yes, idealism often shares space with inexperience, hell, idealism is practically sleeping on inexperience’s couch and chipping in for the rent. But inexperience means that you’re ready to learn.
When young people are idealistic, learning may not be at the forefront of our minds, in my experience we usually place a higher value on action. But our inexperience means that if given the opportunity to act, we’re going to learn. It’s the nature of doing something unfamiliar, and that’s the critical point. What our country needs, who our country needs, are people with a practical, pragmatic understanding of both how to get things accomplished and the necessity of accomplishing them.
There’s no silver bullet for our problems with education, energy, or money, just to name a few. Yes, we need great Federal policy that sets a top-down agenda for addressing clearly defined issues, but that’s not going to determine how best to teach science to kids who’ve grown up without ever seeing a tree. To do that you need to get a person, and it doesn’t have to be a young person, who has learned some science, and loves science, into a classroom so they can try, fail, hang out, learn from better teachers, and eventually find the voice that will speak as well as they’re able to the experiences of their students. You could fill in a hundred thousand other examples, from trying to organize a community to effect political change to starting a business installing solar panels. The critical point is that idealism isn’t just about the action, it’s about the effect of taking action on the individual, and the lessons that they learn. In order to grow the leaders who will have the skills that we need, skills of technical expertise, collaboration, and communication, we need to provide them the opportunities to learn. The idealism that Friedman is talking about is a signal that people, especially young people, are hungry for those opportunities.

Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: